Wednesday, September 21, 2011

What is (good) art?


What is (good) art?
There are two things that I would like to explore this week.  “What is art?” and “What is good art?” You may think that these are very similar questions, but in my opinion, the first can easily be defined, but the second delves much deeper into the realm of opinion.
Look closer. It is not just Abraham Lincoln. By Salvador Dali

            I’ll start this off with defining what I believe art is.  Art is not just paintings, sculptures and performances.  Art is anything that takes creative effort and provokes an emotional or intelligent and thoughtful response. The stronger the emotion or thought, the better. Art comes from creativity, but its goal is to stimulate a reaction of some sort.


            So, now that we know what art is, let’s talk about a few uncharacteristic examples.  One of my favorites is street art. It can come in many forms, performers, musicians, or artists who work in the medium of chalk or spray paint. I’m not going to delve very far into this right now, but street art, in the form of graffiti and tagging, has seen a large rise in the last 10 years or so. It is considered by some to be the art of today. One of the most well-known street artists is Banksy. He started out spray-painting his art on the sides of buildings.  In 2007, a piece created by Banksy called Space Girl and Bird sold for approximately $576,000 at Bonhams in London. From an unknown street artist to having work sold at Bonhams and Sothebys, I think he is expanding the definition of art.
            Banksy is just one of many street artist whose work is becoming increasingly popular in recent years. There are also hundreds of unknown street artists. And the street art of different locals, Europe versus America for example, have very different personalities in their street art. I will discuss more about the art of today in another post.
            So, now that you know better what art is, let’s talk about what makes art good. Why are street art paintings of rats and nonsense selling for $500,000 at prestigious auction houses? Why is this piece exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art in New York? My two-year-old cousin could paint this. I’m sure thousands of people have said just that as they walked past that painting.
            As we defined in the introduction, art is not about the difficulty or aesthetics. It is about using your creativity and asking your viewer to react or make a connection with the piece. Even if that reaction is to piss you off or make you scoff, it still caught your attention. You looked at it and thought about it, that is one piece of the definition of art.
            Creativity is the second part of the definition. You have to think of it. Yes, my two-year-old cousin could have painted that, but she did not intentionally think of it, have a purpose behind it and then execute the idea. That is a main point behind something being defined as art and being chosen to be displayed at a major museum or gallery.
            Now, What do I look for in a piece of art that I love? What draws me to that one special piece when I walk into a gallery? Well, I can’t tell you. It just has that je ne sais quoi. I think it is different for everyone. There's just something that attracts you to art. I am preferential to contemporary or modern art. I like when a piece  makes me question what the artist is trying to say.
            Now, I know I have mostly discussed unconventional forms of art in this post. I wanted to start out with a controversial idea and then briefly discuss more common or mundane ideas. Yes, there is a place in this world for classical art. And, many great works are defined as masterpieces because of their beauty, timelessness and aesthetics. The Mona Lisa is not simply one of the most celebrated classic works because Da Vinci was being creative and thought he would make a realistic portrait of this woman. There is much more behind why she has become an art icon.
Is she beautiful? Frida Kahlo is a very famous feminist artist.
This is being displayed at the MoMA. Yes, they're all the same height. Creepy isn't it?


            But, I digress. So, I have told you what art is and what can make art good. I also shared a little about what I think is great art. Do you all think graffiti is art? How about these artists’ work? It might be offensive or ugly, but does that prevent it from being art?

3 comments:

  1. This was a good article, in that it got me thinking about how I define art. I also agree that it is about emotional connection and intention, but that definition has some problems of it's own.
    If art is intention; then what if an artist creates something with a different 'goal' that art, is it still art?
    For instance, if David Lynch makes a commercial (actually, he's done a few) is it art, or advertising?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I feel like you contradicted yourself immediately in your introduction. "Good" art is completely subjective, as you said it is more in the "realm of opinion". This piece is well thought out, but it feels more like a lecture on an abstract philosophy rather than a means for debate or conversation. Everything you said about 'good' art cannot be debated because it is your opinion and that opinion could match my own or it could not, but there is no way to give more credit to my opinion vs. yours.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ame: I think you bring up a valid point. I, personally, think that it is art. It is art that has been created to serve a purpose other than being art. It is serving the purpose of selling a product. But, it was creative and original, therefore I do believe that it is art.

    Lindsey: I'm not sure how I contradicted myself and it was not my intention. In my opinion, one of the best ways to start conversation and to get people to be more interested in a subject is to state an opinion, especially if it is one that is controversial. In the art world, this subject is being heavily debated and discussed because some traditionalists do not believe that graffiti is actually art.

    I apologize that this did not stimulate any interest for you. I believe though that most blogs, even if based on facts, are opinions or interpretations. Even a lot of politics is based off of opinion. But, you are right my opinion is not worth any more than yours or any other person's.

    ReplyDelete